January 18, 2012: The Day The Internet Citizens of the World Made The U.S. Government Crack!

For the past several months, the U.S. government hasn't been able to agree on anything; taxes, government spending, foreign policy, the economy, etc. But miraculously, these bureaucrats in Washington D.C. came together in a "bipartisan" effort to push two pieces of legislation that threatened the Freedom of the Internet; the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) & Protect Intellectual Property Act (PIPA). And why not? The Movie and Music Industry paid for these bills to be created and passed to the tune of over $90 million in campaign contributions in 2011 (over $100 million in 2010). So its no coincidence, even amidst economic and international uncertainty, that Congress gave this issue special attention.

Although the Movie and Music industries attempted to buy the monopolization of creativity into law, the Internet Citizens of the world came together and rallied against this issue in unison. On January 18, 2012, a virtual protest that encompassed regular Internet users to multinational corporations was planned, implemented and (thanks to all of you) was successful. Because all of us did our part in this historic virtual protest (blogs, vlogs, Tweets, blackouts, phone calls, etc) the government cracked under the pressure.

This is not only a victory for the Internet Citizens of the world but it should show all that if the majority of the masses rally behind one issue, cause or idea, the government will bow to the will of the people. Because of our efforts to organize millions of people behind this issue, the sponsors of SOPA and PIPA are back peddling away from the legislation. Even if these bureaucrats are now back away from this issue, they should still be voted out of office; for their support for SOPA & PIPA is proof that are not public servants.

We should not only remember January 18th 2012 for its Internet success, but it should serve as a reminder that this a government made for the people and by the people. We accomplished more in one day of virtual protests than Occupy Wall Street did with their waste of time, energy and taxpayer money attempt at civil disobedience (they accomplished absolutely nothing after months of turning parks into bio-hazard areas). Let this be a lesson to those that actually want to change the system, instead of panhandling the system like pathetic derelicts.

We did it Internet Citizens! Take a bow, for the last time the government cracked under this type of pressure was the era of the Civil Right Act. Bravo to you all!

Discourse on Gatekeepers, Content and Internet Freedom; "The Internet Belongs to Us!"

The masses have always been at the mercy of the gatekeepers of media, and were only exposed to what those chosen few allowed the masses to see. But with the convergence of all mediums, the gatekeepers of media have lost their reign of dictatorship on what we hear and see. And as time and innovation progresses, we will see that the new gatekeepers of media will be us; the people. The internet has made it possible for us to consolidate all the mediums of old into one. It has enabled us to gather our information and entertainment in an individual and independent fashion. Thus, the future power of producing content for the masses lies with us also. To keep this power of content in our control, we must not let those who monopolize the mechanism of data transfer (Cable modem, DSL, etc) or the older mediums gain the ability to regulate our independent power to gather and/or produce content in any way. Those who will want to regulate the gathering and production of content will be those who used to substantially profit from gate-keeping the content. We have begun to see this with the mp3 pirating debate in the medium of music and radio. The music industry has gone as far as to shut down independent internet radio stations and subpoena people to court because they downloaded a single song from another individual's computer in the privacy of their own home. This subject is very dangerous to our internet freedom.

The argument for copyright infringement is baseless as it pertains to peer-to-peer networking. A computer is a product and becomes property when purchased. When two computers willingly connect through a network connection in any process, the data and information exchanged between the two parties should be confined to the privacy of those two computers. Unless there's proof showing that one of the two computers are generating substantial profits based on copyrighted intellectual properties not belonging to them, the music or which ever industry has no authoritative right to invade our digital privacy.

The film industry is no saint of free data exchange either; they have pursued criminal charges on those innovators that have helped reduce the mega-byte size of films without the reduction of quality. And they have constantly changed industry codec standards so that they can completely prohibit the duplication of film. But same baseless copyright infringement arguments for the music industry, applies also to the film industry. Just because these industries have lost their strangle hold on the content monopoly, doesn't give them the right to become the authority of technological advancement. Anyone else who utilizes the digital tactics used by the music and film industry to monitor supposed illegal activity would be convicted for computer crimes.

The TV networks will be the ones biggest hit by the evolution of content gathering and production. In the supposed golden-age of television, there were only three choices to gather one's content. And the only way one was able to hear and see these three choices (ABC, CBS, & NBC) was via a local network affiliate that relayed a satellite broadcast from the original network's source into antenna based television receivers within a geographical area. Aside from relaying network broadcasts, these network affiliates also supplied local based information and entertainment. Hence, the local news and other programming. This structure was extremely costly and was probably the main reason why the three-choice channel system was the only game in town for a long time. But with the innovation of cable, it allowed other concept networks to produce content without the costly infrastructure network affiliation. Cable companies hard-wired the infrastructure in local communities eliminating the need for user-end satellite reception, but this came at a monthly monetary expense. Moreover, users were at the whim of the gatekeepers of content at cable companies. So content choices where somewhat extensive but still limited.

With the internet, content becomes unlimited to gather and even more possible to individually create. This doesn't mean that the gatekeepers of old will become extinct, they'll just have to adapt to the times. For example, for the past 10 or 15 years we saw old mediums such as AT&T and Time Warner gobble up every phone, cable, and internet provider company that they can sink their capitalist teeth into. Both companies now are offer several mediums of old consolidated into a single bill, because they understand the convergence is coming and both had the foresight to adapt. If these two entities decided to fully merge in the future, they could literally monopolize the broadband internet access market. This in essence means they could become the single-handed gatekeeper of what we hear and see. This is another important issue that puts internet freedom in jeopardy.

The future of television will consist not of a high priced cable bill, but that of an expensive broadband access bill. Instead of being limited to a predetermined list of numbered channels for one's content, there will be millions of websites to gather content. And if one can't find the content that appeases them, then they can create their own. We're beginning to see companies like BlogTalkRadio.com and You Tube.com become innovators in aiding individuals to creating there own content.

Advertising and paid subscription services will still be the key to monetary success to any content producer of the future. This is why companies like BlogTalkRadio.com and You Tube provide an avenue for content production and broadcast so they can attract more content producers. They understand that if their company has the more attractive content, then they can increase their advertising prices because of their prominence in a worldwide audience. Just imagine, presently a local television commercial that includes the cost of production and a couple of weeks of primetime rotation in a mid-size United States city (San Antonio, Phoenix, etc) could cost an advertiser $15,000 minimum. An advertiser can only expect to expose this local advertisement to about a hundred thousand content gatherers, and that's if the advertiser's lucky. Compare that to the ad price of a content provider that attracts an average 10,000,000 content gatherers a month worldwide. How much could an advertiser expect to pay then?

In the near future, content producers of all kinds are going to be sought after from every crack of the globe. Content producer stars will probably become the hardest working individuals on the planet because they've got billions of potential content producers that will continue to get more and more creative to contend with. No longer will we have to palate Radio, TV and Film stars, directors, or producers just because they are force fed to us by gatekeepers. Content gatherers will genuinely appreciate the content producers they read, watch or listen to because they have the legitimate choice to go else where for their content. It will be a never ending world of information and entertainment that would occupy the span of a thousand lifetimes.

But this future potential evolution in human creativity can become sidetracked by those who wish to monitor or police content gathering and/or production. This is why the people of the world can let no company, governing entity or bureaucratic consortium regulate the way we obtain and/or produce content via the Internet. To attach any form of regulation will only infuriate a potential digital revolution of information that could create virtual black markets, cyber extortion and private or corporate espionage; all of which would stagnate and retard the evolution of technology and creativity.

The Future of Spectator Sports: Video Gamers that got Game?

Sundance DiGiovanni, chief executive officer of Major League Gaming (MLG) recently discussed his company's partnership with IMG for a wider medium distribution to globally expand the brand. The brand? Lets just say that these guys are trying to create the NFL of gaming. Providing a legitimate source of revenue and recognition for couch potato gamers taking up space in parents basements and collecting unemployment checks. Above is a Bloomberg News interview with the CEO of MLG.

As video game releases surpass the revenues of Hollywood blockbuster movies, the convergence of technology is taking fantasy entertainment into the pocket books of the gaming industry. As a result, the evolution of capitalizing on this ever expanding market becomes more and more diverse in its ideas for potential entrepreneur. MLG and its partnership with IMG proves that gaming is more than just fun and games; its serious business!

So if you're the parent or a spouse of some couch suffering loser who can't pay for his/her meal and yet, comes up with $60 for latest shoot'em up game, tell them to start gaming for a living. And if they suck at that, then maybe you throw them out on the street because they're a worthless piece of American mooching crap! Oh yeah, below is our sponsor who allows gamers to compete against each other for real cash. So if you think you are the best gamer in the world, click the banner below and put your money where your mouth is!

M00t From 4chan.org Admits His Motives. I Told You These Idiots were Leftists...

For those of you that have kept up with the show, I've been harassed and digitally terrorized by a variety of different groups linked to various websites. One of the websites in question is 4chan.org, a wasteland of anti-social animie nerds that use their website for anonymous child porn exchanges and terrorism plots (such as school shootings, bomb threats, online attacks, etc). These people are the true and utter scum of the Internet.

People always e-mail asking, "Who are these idiots?" For a while, I've been suggesting that these 4channers and others were Leftist agitators who were probably paid to suppress my commentary. They've hacked my chat room, terrorised True Conservative fans and prank called my radio show; all in the name of denying my right to freedom of speech. Below is a clip of the founder of 4chan.org who calls himself M00t (Chris Poole) admitting on camera his Leftist motives. Hate to say I was right again.

One would think that someone who is responsible for so much criminality would be held accountable through our justice system. Instead he's invited to speak at ivy league colleges to the student body and walks the streets without a care in the world. Meanwhile, he's using your children to implement his sick global Leftist agenda through cyber intimidation and/or digital terrorism. We can not allow this madness to go unchecked.

I call on parents, Conservatives, Right-Wing and Patriotic individuals to start holding these individuals accountable. If no authority is going to stop these Internet groups from committing cyber terrorism, then we must stop them ourselves. And the first place to start is at the head! Vent your frustration at the person in this video, because he thinks manipulating your children to do his will is a big joke. Lets show him how loud he'll laugh when he must answer for all that he is responsible for. This is what he looks like, so if you see him, make sure you hold him accountable. LONG LIVE the CONSERVATIVE MOVEMENT!!

To everyone who hates or loves "yours truely!" Leave me a voice message and let mw know how you really feel about the True Conservative Radio Show!

To all the haters and appreciators, I would like to use this blog entry as an opportunity to let all of you know that you can leave me a voice mail on this handy little net widget that's located at the very bottom of the True Conservative Blog website. It's an easy and anonymous way to let me know how you feel about the show or me. Here's what the widget looks like below (scroll all the way down to the bottom of the page).

So to all of you text-chat warriors that raid my chat room during my live radio show, and all the Liberals and Feminists who spread personal attacks about me in the blogoshpere; here's your chance to sound off like you got a pair! So don't be a pussified, pink team playing fruity ass and get to your nearest telephone and leave me a message; you Karl Marx worshipping, Godless scoundrels! BRING IT ON!!!

Yet another example of slutty single mothers getting sympathy from our new Liberal / Feminist society!

For all those Liberals and Feminists who e-mail me saying that single mothers with 6 or 7 kids are isolated incidents, I post this clip for you. This clip comes out of San Antonio, Texas (the colon of America) advertising for a technical college that panders to the poor, single parents and other life losers who would qualify for government funded financial-aid. This ad runs daily during every talk show, court show and soap opera to recruit more morons to capitalize on their aid eligibility. I urge all of you to research technical colleges like this one to see the simplistic tasks they're teaching these buffoons as "career training."

On True Conservative Radio episode #117, I will outline how whore mothers like the one in this clip are able to collect over $4,000+ in government entitlements; all funded by hard-working Americans who did the "right" thing in life. This disgusting activity must stop! That's why I urge all True Conservatives to spit on these dumb broads who have turned baby making into generating taxpayer funded free money! Single mothers are the social-ill in society that can't be showed anymore empathy or sympathy, for this Feminist social engineering has gone far enough. Stand with me against these filthy moochers!

Texas mother dismembers, decapitates and eats her 3 week old son! Claims begin about postpartum psychosis... What a bunch of Feminist propaganda!

A mother out of San Antonio, Texas (the colon of America) allegedly dismembers, decapitates and eats her 3 week old baby son (click here for the full story). I was shocked, but not terribly surprised by the news of this sick, twisted crime; for women now believe they can kill their unwanted children due to our collective Feminist acceptance of such crimes as nothing more than postpartum "complications" or supposed mental disorders. I have been overly vocal against this demented collective acceptance; even going as far as to predict spikes in child deaths in the Summer months due to the classic, "Oh, I accidentally left my child in the car!" excuse. And of course, mothers usually get away with it by displaying their Hollywood induced hysterics and crocodile tears (just as I predict every year on the True Conservative Radio Show).

Thirty-three year old Otty Sanchez, the Hannibal-cannibal mother out of Texas, told the police that the devil made her cut off her baby's head, tear off his face and eat his brain (not to mention gnawing on three of his toes). As this story hit the national news wire, Feminist psychologists and other like-minded suedo-scientists began suggesting that this crime had evidence of postpartum psychosis. But how many children have to die before we realize that these so-called mental disorders (I.E. Postpartum depression, Munchhausen Syndrome by Proxy, etc) are nothing more than premeditated murder excuses for insanity pleas. Anyone who kills a child, for any reason, should be put to death; period! But I'm willing to bet money Sanchez will be found not guilty when everything is said and done; and I'm not joking!

In our new Liberal/Feminist America, cold-blooded murders like Andrea Yates, Dena Schlosser and other bimbos go free everyday on these Liberal/Feminist insanity pleas. Andrea Yates drowned 5 of her own children and said that Satan was inside her and she was "saving" them from going hell; she was acquitted by a pro-child killing jury in 2006 by reason of insanity. Dena Schlosser chopped off her 10-month old baby's arms because she wanted to give her baby to God; she was acquitted by a pro-child killing jury in 2004. And then we wonder why how such horror can be consistently bestowed upon innocent children; it's because America accepts these pathetic mental disorders as legitimate excuses for get-out-jail-free child murdering.

So for all of you people that find this story out of Texas disturbing, get used to it. Mothers who finally begin to realize that having children is a minimum 18 year commitment (especially this filthy single mothers), they begin entertaining the idea of murdering them in exchange for a maximum 5 year mental institution commitment; thanks to the old insanity plea based on Liberal/Feminist excuses. If you are a Liberal or a Feminist, then you are responsible for this epidemic; you must all be very proud!

The BlogTalkRadio Network and their ass-kissing minions makes me sick!

I've been broadcasting on the BlogTalkRadio Network for two years, and have been successful in getting a loyal base of fans and haters (thanks to you all). I've accumulated thousands of live listens and podcast downloads, all thanks to my own promotion and hard work; and I've never gotten any props or highlights from the goofs who run the company.

Instead they promote (and pay as employees) these ditsy bimbos (i.e. Media Lizzy) and other lame hosts that do nothing but kiss the ass of management to get such opportunities (even though no one listens to these milky lickers). I think its pathetic!

I've listened to all the so-called popular broadcasts on BTR, and most barely have 6 or 7 people in their chatroom (this is after BTR promotes their shows via e-mail, homepage features and blogs). But BTR, for whatever reason, insists on giving these boring fruity-asses props, highlights and authority over other hosts that aren't in the BTR ass-tickling click.

If I don't see that my hard work and content is being appreciated within the next couple of months, I'm going to leave the BTR Network! That's right, I've recently been e-mailed by a company similar to BTR's that promises to give me the emphasis I deserve; and I'm seriously considering moving broadcast to their Network.

So keep up to date with the show, because if I decide leave, I would like everyone (including the Liberal and Feminists who agitate my show) to come with me! Thanks to all who listen and please let BTR know what you think about True Conservative Radio!

Facebook bows down under the pressure! I say still cancel your accounts!

I had stated on my show last week that all users of the social networking site Facebook, should cancel their accounts. It was highlighted earlier this month that Facebook's "terms of service" was altered to give exclusive rights to all the user-created content posted on the site to Facebook; even if one were to decide to cancel their account. I was outraged at this company and it's founder, Mark Zuckerberg.

But now that the Internet users of the world decide to revolt against these authoritarian tactics used by Facebook, Zuckerberg and his goons have bowed down to the users and eliminated the "TOS" clause stated previous. But I feel that Internet users should make Facebook pay for its infringement on our Internet freedom. That's why I still call on everyone to cancel their Facebook accounts and tell Mark Zuckerberg to piss off!

Facebook, as stated in several reports, is worth close to 1.3 Billion dollars as of right now. And they have the audacity to secretly change the "TOS" agreement under every one's noses to give them exclusive monetary rights to your likeness, pictures, blogs, videos and any other content that you wish to post (even if you close your account)? I think Zuckerberg has some nerve, and it would be a great day to see Facebook collapse under its own greed.

Remember Zuckerberg, you fruity-ass bastard, the people are the ones who created the networth of your company and made Facebook what it is today. Secretly changing your "TOS" is the equivilent of kicking all the Facebook users in the balls and telling them to smile about it. You and your pathetic company are a piece of trash, and anyone who still decides to stay on as a Facebook user must like being treated like a 2-dollar whore with a 3-dollar rebate!